Dozens of organizations supporting women’s rights and migrants have accused the Government of promoting a narrative that blames migrants for the failures of the state, labeling it as “institutionally racist.” More than 70 groups have criticized the Labour party for perpetuating a “hostile environment” that traps vulnerable women and girls who are at risk of abuse. They argue that addressing violence against women and girls and modern slavery is undermined by a discriminatory system based on immigration status.
The groups have raised concerns about the immigration white paper introduced in May, describing it as endorsing “state sanctioned violence.” In a collective statement addressed to Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood, they condemned the government for constructing a misleading and racially biased narrative that scapegoats migrant communities for systemic governmental shortcomings.
Among their demands, the organizations called for the abolition of the no recourse to public funds (NRPF) rules, which restrict individuals from claiming most benefits and housing allowances, hindering support for women facing significant risks of abuse. Additionally, they urged Mahmood to repeal the Tory Illegal Migration Act and the Nationality and Borders Act, which reduced protections for victims of trafficking.
Highlighting the need for a clear separation between support services and immigration enforcement, the statement emphasized that victims of abuse are reluctant to seek help due to fears of deportation. Selma Taha, the Executive Director of Southall Black Sisters, criticized the Immigration White Paper, labeling it as a manifestation of the government’s alignment with far-right ideologies in immigration policies, which could further marginalize migrant women and other vulnerable communities.
The groups emphasized the importance of extending protections regardless of immigration status to effectively combat violence against women and girls. They stressed that policies promoting a “hostile environment” increase the risks of violence and abuse against women and impede their right to safety. Long-term funding for organizations supporting women with NRPF was also advocated as a cost-effective measure that could save millions over a few years.
Gisella Vale, Director of the Latin American Women’s Rights Service, pointed out that policies jeopardizing the safety of migrant survivors must be reevaluated, with a focus on prioritizing their protection and needs. Government responses to violence that blame immigration were criticized for creating additional risks for women seeking safety and diverting attention from the root causes of violence and abuse.
In response, a government spokesperson defended the measures as necessary to regain control over national borders following years of unregulated migration. They mentioned ongoing efforts to review the modern slavery system to prevent exploitation and ensure the safety and dignity of those targeted by criminals.